Entries tagged as ‘democratic’
I told you I’d get round to writing this up… here it is!
Just over a week ago I took part in a series of workshops, discussions and deliberations at the University of Edmonton in the province of Alberta, Canada. I was one of a handful of ‘deliberation/participation people’ who were there to have input into how the diverse group of Albertans present might best set up a successful, province-wide deliberative process on climate change issues.

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
The event was participated in by an impressively varied group of individuals – representing a significant range of viewpoints including; energy industry representatives, radical environmentalists, political activists and government officials. The thing that all parties had in common was a genuine, and strong desire to move forward on the issue of climate change in Alberta. (They even gave up their weekend and worked 12hour days for free to be part of the deliberation – so I can testify to their commitment!)
So, what were we actually doing?
We wanted to put together a basis for how a public discussion on climate change in Alberta might best work – and help to move forward from polarised debate on climate change into more useful dialogue and action across the province.
Alberta is a focal point for climate change discussion as the Canadian economy has greatly benefited from the energy industry located there, including the booming Athabascan oil sands near Fort McMurray. This industry has been strongly criticised by environmental campaigners and scientists for its impact on the environment. Alberta embodies many of the environmental and economic debates taking place globally.
A key part of how myself and others present felt that progress could be made on these tough issues was through using deliberative techniques to bring people together in a more constructive and positive way than through debate and conflict.
How did you go about it?
Two main groups were involved in the design process over about four days:
One was a smaller group of around 15 and consisted both of Albertans and of visitors interested in assisting with the deliberation and public participation aspects. This group was present throughout the entirety of the process every day.
The second group was a larger group of around 50 Albertans who were present at key points in the design process to act as a ’sounding board’ for the ideas that the smaller group had been discussing and formulating together during the day.
This format worked well in that ownership of the process and its aims began to be built from the outset amongst a very varied group of individuals, and the rapid response and interaction between the smaller and larger group helped to refine ideas very quickly over a short period of time.
By the end of the five days we worked together to uncover the bare bones of a process that could work for Albertans, wandered across a suprising amount of common ground and found several leverage points for instigating action. As we walked out of the room on the final day, an interim steering group had been set in place and action points had been established for moving forward… so watch this space.
The experience made me feel very positive about what can be acheived through using more deliberative approach to difficult issues like action on climate change - not a form of consensus building, but rather a way of better understanding one another and identifying areas for beneficial progress.
Categories: citizenship · communities · democracy · design · empowerment · engagement · environment · environmental · internet/web · participation · politics · pubpart · web 2.0
Tagged: alberta, canada, carbon, climate change, deliberation, deliberative, deliberative democracy, democratic, discussion, edmonton, emissions, energy, environment, environmental, government, green, industry, oil, oil sands, participation, political, politics, tar sands
I just got back from an intense week of work in Edmonton, Alberta, assisting the design and faciliation of a deliberative process on the environment. I’ll be writing in more detail on here next week about this unique experience which included a diverse range of people interested in using deliberative methods as a way of addressing future issues on climate change in Alberta.
For now – I don’t want you all to feel like you’ve been forgotten about… (I wouldn’t forget you!) so here’s something related for your browsing pleasure: Candid Answers 2008.
Candid Answers is a US- based ‘voter guide for the environment’ which aims to showcase candidates’ answers to five key environmental questions side by side in a clear format. I think the concept is great but for two things:
1) It is not run by a neutral body – but by the NRDC - an environmental campaigning organisation
2) There is nowhere near enough impartial information available through the site to help people understand the issues more deeply.
Other than that I love the concept and the simplicity… it would be greatly strengthened by addressing the two issues above.
Check it out for yourself!
Categories: citizenship · democracy · empowerment · environment · environmental · innovation · internet/web · participation · politics · science · social innovation · social media · web 2.0 · web2.0
Tagged: answer, answers, candid, candid answers, democracy, democratic, elected, election, environment, environmental, representative, voting
The Ministry of Justice’s Innovation Fund is once again open for bids. The purpose and ethos of the fund is as follows, in the MoJ’s own words:
We want more people to participate in our democracy, and we want you to come up with ways to make this happen.
The UK Government is working hard to connect with people – as you can see in the Governance of Britain programme and the Communities in Control White Paper.
Now we want to support projects that you will run to help people to address public issues and influence government.
If you can think of a way to get people talking, we’d like to hear it. We have £150,000 available to develop about ten proposals.
The way the fund is being administered this year encourages a more innovative and collaborative approach in itself as the call for ideas has taken place in an open format, and is now open online for submission and discussion. The process will work in three stages:
1) Upload your ideas to the website and discuss them online – there is an opportunity to colloaborate on ideas, strengthen initial bids and build partnerships at this stage.
2) Continuation of online discussion through September, with a possible event scheduled in during this month. Formal applications are invited to be submitted before 4pm on 26th September
3) The selection panel makes its decision in the second week of October
Check out: www.buildingdemocracy.co.uk to upload your ideas and for further info.
Categories: citizenship · collaboration · communities · democracy · empowerment · engagement · internet/web · participation · politics · social media · tools · voting · web 2.0 · web2.0 · youth · youtube
Tagged: building democracy, civic, civil, democracy, democratic, democratic engagement innovation fund, edemocracy, engagement, funding, funds, innovation fund, involve, involvement, ministry of justice, moj, online, participation, project funding, social software
This site (Sokwanele) is one of the most powerful campaign sites I’ve come across.
Superb use of flickr, twitter, mapping, e-cards and blog to get the Zimbabwe pro democracy message out.

Zimbabwe 2008
“Sokwanele – Zvakwana is a peoples’ movement, embracing supporters of all pro-democratic political parties, civic organizations and institutions in Zimbabwe. Sokwanele and Zvakwana both mean ‘enough is enough’ in the vernacular.”
Thanks to GalloManor for original heads up.
Categories: blogging · campaigning · cased · citizenship · communities · empowerment · engagement · internet/web · nptech · participation · politics · social media · voting · web 2.0 · web2.0
Tagged: campaigning, civil rights, democracy, democratic, elections, mugabe, nptech, sokwanele, violence, voting, zimbabwe
Ask the PM a question on Youtube - he will then reply to the most-voted for ones apparently…. quite a cool idea – but would like to see more of this at local government and parish/town council level where it might connect more closely to the impacts of the answers …
This sort of public pressure for answers is something that Yoosk have also been trying to get up and running by using their site as a gathering point for questions for prominent figures to be posted up – then voted on by the public to gain momentum behind them.
These are innovative and interesting ideas, but hard to see where this will connect into the democratic process in any meaningful way. Sure, its an example of social software for public interest, but without a satisfying answer – what changes? Also, without the public figure being in a position to give time and energy to interacting in this way this could frustrate the questioners still further rather than produce some positive result.
However, not wanting to be too gloomy about these things – I do believe that these examples are just the beginning of a re-shaping of interaction between citizen and decision-maker which will mature into something more focused and therefore with greater impact. With initiatives like Downing St. YouTube and Yoosk leading the way its a good first step into more meaningful interactions in future…
Categories: blogging · campaigning · citizenship · communities · democracy · empowerment · engagement · gordon brown · internet/web · participation · politics · pubpart · social media · tools · web 2.0 · web2.0 · youtube
Tagged: citizen, democratic, downing st., engagement, interaction, involve, involvement, participation, pmqs, prime minister, state, yoosk, youtube