Entries tagged as ‘nptech’

I just met this group of young Iranians and supporters on Waterloo Bridge. They’re campaigning on the recent Iranian voting scandal and will be protesting in London outside the Iranian embassy this Saturday as part of the http://www.whereismyvote.org/ global day of action on July 25th from 1-4pm.
“The Global Day of Action is not affiliated with any partisan political agenda and is aimed at securing the internationally recognized rights of the Iranian people”
Interesting to see local groups getting active and handing out flyers in such a positive and friendly way, I think it really works well. I’d say that I’m far more likely to go along to something if asked in person rather than tweeted at, emailed or facebook-messaged. Social media is great, but sometimes having a chat is what’s really the motivator.
As it is, I’m off on holiday from tomorrow so can’t be there, so went to the website to find out more about what I could do online instead. Joining a Facebook group is not as good as turning up by any means, but its a way of showing support and keeping in touch with the cause, and other opportunities to act in real life.
Aha! So that might be what social media is for….?
—- Newsflash! —-In ‘Other Inspiring Iranians I’ve met on Waterloo Bridge’, see my Ahmad Foroughi post from the time of the Obama Election – an awesome photo, and a sweet piece of social history!
Categories: campaigning · citizen · citizenship · communities · democracy · election · empowerment · engagement · iran · nptech · obama · participation · social media · voting · web 2.0 · web2.0 · youth
Tagged: campaigners, campaigns, election, green, iran, iranelection, iranian, london, nptech, social media, vote, waterloo bridge
Hello all. Apparently that post before last was a bit long… well, I’m afraid I just had alot to get off my chest on global-local deliberation on climate change!
Today I’ll be brief to make up for it…
My presentation for the Participation and Social Media Action Learning set run by Tim Davies at LGIU is right here.
It is *hopefully a simple starting point for evaluation aimed at those setting up an online engagement project. My main argument was that a good evaluation tells a compelling story through combining qualitative and quantitative information in a clear format to key decision makers and practitioners.
Categories: empowerment · engagement · evaluation · nptech · participation · social innovation · social media · tools · user centred · web 2.0 · web2.0
Tagged: action learning set, deliberate, deliberation, engage, engagement, evaluate, evaluation, involve, lgiu, nptech, online, participation, social media, tim davies, web 2.0, web2.0
December 8, 2008 · 1 Comment
What is Social Innovation Camp?
Well, the sicamp website explains far better than I could here and here so in their own cut n’ pasted words, the idea is basically that:
The web has already had a huge impact on the way we live our lives: it has changed how we communicate, how we entertain ourselves, our friendships and the way we work. Now it is going to change how we access our health care, how we educate our children and how we provide for the most vulnerable in our communities….
Social Innovation Camp is an experiment in creating social innovations for the digital age.
It is a competition to find the best ideas for web tools to create social change, a participant-driven event aimed at bringing together software developers and designers with those at the sharp end of social need: social innovators, entrepreneurs and those with direct experience of need themselves.
Got that?
So I spent the last weekend holed up in the basement of The Young Foundation working with a bunch of talented people with a whole range of different skills in order to build a prototype webtool, business model, social case and funding pitch for a project called The Good Gym. Which then won!

The idea of GoodGym is to provide isolated or immobile older people with regular human contact and to provide motivation for people to run and get fit. The Good Gym aims to make it easy for people to channel the energy used up as part of their exercise routine toward a wider social good. The project will set up a matching and vetting service for joggers/cyclists to integrate brief visits to isolated older people into their regular exercise routines.
Here’s the final presentation which should explain a bit more of the detail. Check out the other finalists here.(The sheer amount of work done on AccessCity is worth a look!)
So, just goes to show – lock people with different skills together in a room, feed them, give them a deadline and an incentive – result = a bunch of amazing online projects for social good!
Now to sustain the momentum…will keep you posted.
Categories: ageism · cased · citizenship · codesign · collaboration · communities · democracy · empowerment · innovation · participation · social innovation · social media · web 2.0 · web2.0
Tagged: elders, fitness, good gym, goodgym, gym, involvement, isolation, nptech, old people, older people, participation, pubpart, running, sicamp, social innovation, social innovation camp, social media, volunteering, web 2.0, web2.0, young foundation
This site (Sokwanele) is one of the most powerful campaign sites I’ve come across.
Superb use of flickr, twitter, mapping, e-cards and blog to get the Zimbabwe pro democracy message out.

Zimbabwe 2008
“Sokwanele – Zvakwana is a peoples’ movement, embracing supporters of all pro-democratic political parties, civic organizations and institutions in Zimbabwe. Sokwanele and Zvakwana both mean ‘enough is enough’ in the vernacular.”
Thanks to GalloManor for original heads up.
Categories: blogging · campaigning · cased · citizenship · communities · empowerment · engagement · internet/web · nptech · participation · politics · social media · voting · web 2.0 · web2.0
Tagged: campaigning, civil rights, democracy, democratic, elections, mugabe, nptech, sokwanele, violence, voting, zimbabwe
Yes, the rumours are true – there is a plan…
I’ve been thinking how to structure this blog thingummy in a way that will make it a useful resource – and moreover to make sure it hits the spot somewhere between interesting and informative – hopefully managing both simultaneously! See my introductory post.
So … I plan to split up the subject matter as best I can into three areas:
1.Public participation in all its many and varied forms (tag/category:pubpart)
2.How my blogging is going – documenting my learning and general web-based flailing around (tag/category:blogging)
3. A few links to interesting bits and pieces that I find lying around the wwweb – all work and no play is dull after all…. :) (tag/category:stuff)
To try and help you order this info I’m going separately tag all of my off topic non-participation related posts categorise as ’stuff’, then make sure that all of my public participation and blogging posts have either blogging or pubpart on there as a tag and category. Simple eh?
Er, yes you blogging novice, but what’s this pubpart thing?
Well, what it is not, is something to do with hanging around having a hearty drink, nor is it the opposite of privatepart. (Although thanks for those suggestions people!)
What it IS, is a way of trying to bring together all of the many diverse participation-related resources and information from across youth, health, development, community - all policy areas both online and off by marking them with a recognisable tag in a community tagging project. This could work much like the nptech tag monitored by Beth Kanter in this weekly digest or along the lines of the tag aggregator recently used by ruralnet in their co-design process.
Please check out Tim Davies’ far more considered explanation of how pubpart will work here.
A public participation community certainly exists both in the UK and internationally but as a whole is so loose and fragmented across a number of policy areas and interests that there are few places that draw together expertise from across the board.
[Check out www.peopleandparticipation.net for one such cross-policy participation effort. I think its a good start, but then I am quite biased as I do work for Involve! Let me know what you think about the site on here:) ]
The idea of using a community tagging system like pubpart is one way of further unifying the many different voices out there which touch on various aspects of public participation and involvement, be it edemocracy, social media, PPI networks etc.
I’d be really interested to know what you think about the idea and to know if you’ll be joining in yourself.
—-
My link of today:
Do poor people use Yahoo and those better off use Google?
If this is so, what does it say about online cultures?
Categories: about · blogging · participation · pubpart
Tagged: alice casey, cased, edemocracy, engagement, google, involve, involvement, networks, nptech, participation, ppi, public, pubpart, social media, yahoo